Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 204 F.1d 322 - Ex parte Dickey

Ex parte Dickey’s Empirical Analysis

204 F. 322 · 1913

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
October 1951
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 2 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently October 1951

1 federal appellate · 2 district ·

2019131920193019401950decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Carter v. McClaughry · Smith v. Whitney · Swaim v. United States · Carter v. Roberts · Tobias Watkins

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The decisions of tbe Supreme Court in reference to the power of military tribunals is founded upon the doctrine that the third article of the Constitution has conferred upon Congress the power to create certain federal courts; that another power is conferred upon Congress in the first article of the Constitution, namely, to make rules for the government and regulation of the land and naval forces. These powers are independent of each other. They are derived from different articles of the Constitution. When courts organized under these respective powers are proceeding within the limits of their jurisdiction, it is clear that they must be held free from any interference.” Ex parte Dickey (D. C.) 204 Fed. 322 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““to make rules for the government and regulation of the land and naval forces.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.