Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 204 F.1d 69 - Noble v. Gustafson

Noble v. Gustafson’s Empirical Analysis

204 F. 69 · 1913

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
July 2009
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently July 2009

2 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

201913192019301940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Pioneer Mining Co. v. Delamotte

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “was not a work incidental to the development of the mine or the alteration or repair of any building; flume, or tunnel in connection therewith.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “the mining work, namely, the sinking of the shafts, the running of the tunnels and the development work in general,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.