Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 204 F.2d 223 - Hyde Park Clothes, Inc. v. Hyde Park Fashions, Inc.

Hyde Park Clothes, Inc. v. Hyde Park Fashions, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

204 F.2d 223 · 1953

Citation profile

43
cited by 43 later decisions
June 2004
most recently cited

23 federal appellate · 2 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 43 later decisions — most recently June 2004 · most notably Maternally Yours, Inc. v. Your Maternity Shop, Inc. (1956), Avon Shoe Co., Inc., and Haymaker Shoe Corp. v. David Crystal, Inc., Haymaker Sports, Inc., B. Altman & Co., Best & Co., Inc., and John Wanamaker (1960)

23 federal appellate · 2 district ·

240195319601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 15 U.S.C. § 1114 (§ 32 of the Trademark Act of 1946 (Lanham Act)) · 15 U.S.C. § 1125 (§ 43 of the Trademark Act of 1946 (Lanham Act)) · 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (Class Action Fairness Act of 2005) · 28 U.S.C. § 1338 · 28 U.S.C. § 46

Relies on Steele v. Bulova Watch Co. · Mishawaka Rubber & Woolen Manufacturing Co. v. S. S. Kresge Co. · Bridges v. United States · S. C. Johnson & Son, Inc. v. Johnson · Aunt Jemima Mills Co. v. Rigney & Co.

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.