United States v. Rosenstreich’s Empirical Analysis
204 F.2d 321 · 1953
Citation profile
27 federal appellate · 1 district · 10 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 44 later decisions — most recently November 2002 · most notably Kohlfuss v. Warden of Connecticut State Prison (1962), Tatum v. United States (1962)
27 federal appellate · 1 district · 10 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Ex parte Lange · Bozza v. United States · United States v. Benz · Roberts v. United States · Clarence Murphy v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 44 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““It is well settled that, thanks to the double-jeopardy provision of the Fifth Amendment, a federal court may not increase (a) a sentence of imprisonment, once execution of the sentence has begun, or (b) a sentence to pay a fine, after the fine first imposed has been paid . . . ” 204 F.2d, at 321 .”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority““Nor are eases in point which hold valid a sentence heavier than the original sentence where the latter was ruled to be invalid on defendant’s suit, Murphy v. Massachusetts, 177 U.S. 155 , 20 S.Ct. 639 , 44 L.Ed. 711 , or where the original sentence was invalid because of the failure to impose the required minimum penalties, Bozza v. United States, 330 U.S. 160 , 67 S.Ct. 645 , 91 L.Ed. 818 . Of course, reduction of a sentence partly executed is not invalid, United States v. Benz, 282 U.S. 304 , 51 S.Ct. 113 , 75 L.Ed. 354 .” 204 F.2d at 322 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.