Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 204 F.2d 472 - Stein v. Mazer

Stein v. Mazer’s Empirical Analysis

204 F.2d 472 · 1953

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
January 2009
most recently cited

14 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently January 2009

14 federal appellate ·

100195319601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

Relationships

Applies 35 U.S.C. § 171

Relies on Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. South Texas Lumber Co · Morton Salt Co. v. G. S. Suppiger Co. · F. W. Woolworth Co. v. Contemporary Arts, Inc. · Bleistein v. Donaldson Lithographing Co. · Merchants Nat Bank of Boston v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Since a copyright is intended to protect authorship, the essence of copyright protection is the protection of originality rather than novelty or invention.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““Any person who has invented any new, original, and ornamental design for an article of manufacture, * * * may * * * obtain a patent therefor. * * * ” 3”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “infringement of six copyrights for small three-dimensional statuettes of male and female dancing figures made of semi-vitreous china.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.