Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

204 F.2d 693

Docket No. 14804.

Kelm v. Van Slyke

Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided April 27, 1953.

Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1953-04-27

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently April 1953

1 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Relies on 107 F. Supp. 229 - Van Slyke v. Kelm

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1953-04-27

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1George MacKinnon, U. S. Atty., and Alex Dim, Asst. U. S. Atty., Minneapolis, Minn., for appellant.

¶2Morgan, Headley, Raudenbttsh & Morgan, St. Paul, Minn., for appellees.

¶3PER CURIAM.

¶4Appeal from District Court, 107 F.Supp. 229, dismissed without taxation of costs in favor of either of the parties in this Court, on stipulation of parties.

/204/f2d/693 · .json · Public domain