Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 204 F.2d 834 - Hibdon v. United States

Hibdon v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

204 F.2d 834 · 1953

Citation profile

78
cited by 78 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
7
states following
May 2012
most recently cited

60 federal appellate · 1 district · 8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 78 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently May 2012 · most notably Williams v. Florida (1970), Baldwin v. New York Williams (1970)

60 federal appellate · 1 district · 8 state decisions

2301953196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Adams v. United States Ex Rel. McCann · Patton v. United States · Thompson v. State of Utah · Andres v. United States · Lucas v. Kansas City Structural Steel Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 78 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “* * * a multiplicity of sentences impairs a prisoner's opportunities for pardon or parole”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““The accused, if found guilty was still under obligation to face the court for sentence and be at the mercy of a Judge whose suggestion to him to accept a majority verdict was flouted. It is conceivable, in these circumstances, that the hazard of judicial disfavor by an impatient Judge might seem to him a serious one. His acquiescence in the Court’s suggestion did, in fact, prove to be without serious detriment to him, for the sentences were made to run concurrently with the term he was already serving. They might well have been cumulative.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “there cannot be a verdict supported by proof beyond a reasonable doubt if one or more jurors remain reasonably in doubt as to guilt”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.