Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 204 F.2d 954 - Chicago, R. I. & P. R. v. Stude

Chicago, R. I. & P. R. v. Stude’s Empirical Analysis

204 F.2d 954 · 1953

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
June 1960
most recently cited

5 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Relies on Burford v. Sun Oil Co. · Kohl v. United States · Chappell v. United States · Metropolitan Railroad Company v. Henry B F Macfarland L · Chicago, R. I. & P. R. v. Stude

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The question of whether the Rock Island could have initiated the proceedings in the United States District Court is not before us for the simple reason that it did not do so and hence the propriety of such action is not presented. We express no opinion on that subject.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.