Weekley v. Moore’s Empirical Analysis
204 F.3d 1083 · 2000
Citation profile
17 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Lovasz v. Vaughn · Tony Bruce Bennett v. Christopher Artuz, Superintendent · Webster v. Moore · Feliz Talaz Villegas v. Gary L. Johnson, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division · Wilcox v. Florida Department of Corrections
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]he resolution of this appeal ... turns on whether a successive petition such as Weekley's is nonetheless a 'properly filed application' under 28 U.S.C. 2244(d)(2).”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“[t]o import consideration of the merits of the petition into this determination seems to me to be in direct conflict with the plain meaning of the phrase 'properly filed' as it is used in the statute.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent“[t]he time during which a properly filed application for State post-conviction or other collateral review with respect to the pertinent judgment or claim is pending shall not be counted toward any period of limitation under this subsection.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Hurley v. Moore
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.