Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 204 F.3d 1170 - In re Sealed Case

In re Sealed Case’s Empirical Analysis

204 F.3d 1170 · 2000

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
January 2011
most recently cited

6 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3553 · 28 U.S.C. § 994

Relies on United States v. Olano · United States v. Frady · United States v. Saro · United States v. Ortez · United States v. Beckham

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “from the perspective of the trial court, the claimed error was so plain that the trial judge and prosecutor were derelict in countenancing it, even absent the defendant's timely assistance in detecting it.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.