Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 204 F.3d 1187 - Douglas Schwenk v. James Hartford

Douglas Schwenk v. James Hartford’s Empirical Analysis

204 F.3d 1187 · 2000

Citation profile

144
cited by 144 later decisions
4
states following
March 2025
most recently cited

50 federal appellate · 20 district · 4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 144 later decisions — most recently March 2025 · most notably Alexandra White Joseph Deringer Richard Graham v. Russell Lee Lynn Tamiyasu-Lee Lavera Gillespie Paul Smith Robert Zurowski John Phillips Elizabeth Julian (2000), Moss v. U.S. Secret Service (2009)

50 federal appellate · 20 district · 4 state decisions

730200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Harlow v. Fitzgerald · Anderson v. Creighton · Farmer v. Brennan · Price Waterhouse v. Hopkins · Pierson v. Ray

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 144 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The initial judicial approach taken in cases such as Holloway [and Ulane ] has been overruled by the logic and language of Price Waterhouse. "). By holding that Title VII protected a woman who failed to conform to social expectations concerning how a woman should look and behave, the Supreme Court established that Title VII's reference to "sex”
    10 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “does not extend to claims in which the determination of qualified immunity depends on disputed issues of material fact.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “In the simplest and most absolute of terms, the Eighth Amendment right of prisoners to be free from sexual abuse was unquestionably clearly established prior to the time of this alleged assault, and no reasonable prison guard could possibly have believed otherwise.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.