Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 204 F.3d 168 - Felder v. Johnson

Felder v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis

204 F.3d 168 · 2000

Citation profile

114
cited by 114 later decisions
2
states following
January 2022
most recently cited

40 federal appellate · 3 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 114 later decisions — most recently January 2022 · most notably Souter v. Jones (2005), United States of America v. Gary Allen Patterson (2000)

40 federal appellate · 3 district · 2 state decisions

890200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Lewis Director Arizona Department of Corrections v. Casey · Lonchar v. Thomas · Dale Oney v. Darrell Ratliff Jungle Rags Inc Walt Disney Company Walt Disney Consumer Products Walt Disney World Company the Disney Store Inc · Moscariello v. United States · Miller v. Marr

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 114 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “rare and exceptional circumstances where it is necessary to preserve a plaintiff's claims when strict application of the statute of limitations would be inequitable.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “Equitable tolling is appropriate when an extraordinary factor beyond the plaintiff's control prevents his filing on time.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  3. “the time during which a properly filed application for State post-conviction or other collateral review with respect to the pertinent judgment or claim is pending shall not be counted toward any period of limitation under this subsection.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.