Parker v. Columbia Pictures Industries’s Empirical Analysis
204 F.3d 326 · 2000
Citation profile
69 federal appellate · 25 district · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 322 later decisions — most recently July 2022 · most notably Kassner v. 2nd Avenue Delicatessen Inc. (2007), Leary v. Daeschner (2003)
69 federal appellate · 25 district · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Price Waterhouse v. Hopkins · Cleveland v. Policy Management Systems Corp. · Alaska v. United States · North Carolina v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission · Johnson v. Mammoth Recreations, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 322 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“despite the lenient standard of Rule 15(a), a district court does not abuse its discretion in denying leave to amend the pleadings after the deadline set in the scheduling order where the moving party has failed to establish good cause”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“A finding of good cause depends on the diligence of the moving party.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“disability played a motivating role in the decision,”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.