Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 204 F.3d 360 - Darius Morgan v. Floyd Bennett, Superintendent, Elmira Correctional Facility

Darius Morgan v. Floyd Bennett, Superintendent, Elmira Correctional Facility’s Empirical Analysis

204 F.3d 360 · 2000

Citation profile

88
cited by 88 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
5
states following
January 2024
most recently cited

18 federal appellate · 1 district · 6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 88 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently January 2024 · most notably George Duncan Superintendent Great Meadow Correctional Facility v. Sherman Walker (2001), Duncan v. Walker (2001)

18 federal appellate · 1 district · 6 state decisions

770200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Delaware v. Van Arsdall · Davis v. Alaska · United States v. Cronic · Roviaro v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 88 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “all issues outlined in defendant-appellant's brief and pro se supplemental brief”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “important need to protect a countervailing interest,”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[Ijntimidation of witnesses raises concerns for both the well-being of the witness and her family and the integrity of the judicial process.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.