Kitts v. Apfel’s Empirical Analysis
204 F.3d 785 · 2000
Citation profile
10
cited by 10 later decisions
August 2012
most recently cited
5 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Relies on Curtiss-Wright Corp. v. Schoonejongen · Curtiss-Wright Corp. v. Schoonejongen · Mackey v. Shalala · Reynolds v. Chater · Sullins v. Shalala
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“`the Appeals Council has considered new and material evidence and declined review, we must decide whether the ALJ's decision is supported by substantial evidence in the whole record, including the new evidence.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“). Dr. Dickson's opinion, if credited, might well persuade the ALJ that Gartman could not return to work at the Penn factory. We therefore remand to the district court with instructions to remand to the SSA. 26 On remand, the ALJ should weigh Dr. Dickson's medical opinion that Gartman requires a job where her leg may be elevated from time to time against the other medical evidence already in the record. In addition, the ALJ should compare Gartman's workplace needs against the actual working environment at the Penn factory. Of course,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.