Gust v. Tolson

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided November 2, 2006

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2006-11-02

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently February 2007

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2006-11-02

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM:

¶1Thomas E. Gust, Bryon W. Sisk, Roger C. Howard, Todd Leopard, Michael Miranda, Herman G. Shamel, Jr., David L. Biles, and Thomas J. Squirek appeal the district court’s order granting Appellees’ motions to dismiss. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Gust v. Tolson, No. 3:05-cv-00444, 2006 WL 1215414 (W.D.N.C. May 9, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶2AFFIRMED.