Crue v. Aiken’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio Corporation · Harlow v. Fitzgerald · Pickering v. Board of Education of Township High School District 205 Will County Illinois
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) the speaker must apply to the deci-sionmaker before engaging in the pro posed communication; (2) the decision-maker is empowered to determine whether the applicant should be granted permission based on his/her review of the proposed content of the communication; (3) approval of the request requires affirmative action by the decision-maker; and (4) approval is not a matter of routine, but involves the “appraisal of facts, the exercise of judgment, and the formation of an opinion” by the decision-maker.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Wernsing v. Thompson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.