White v. Osmose, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 5 district · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 29 U.S.C. § 1161 (§ 601 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974) · 29 U.S.C. § 201 (American Samoa Labor Standards Amendments of 1956) · 29 U.S.C. § 203 · 29 U.S.C. § 216 · 29 U.S.C. § 255
Relies on Hoffmann-La Roche Inc. v. Sperling · Mooney v. Aramco Services Co. · Herman v. RSR Security Services Ltd. · David Hipp Brad Stein v. Liberty National Life Insurance Co · Grayson v. K Mart Corp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“carefully consider the submissions of the parties with respect to the class allegations, rather than merely relying on the handful of affidavits [supporting the plaintiff's] position”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“it is doubtful that § 216(b) would further the interests of judicial economy, and it would undoubtedly present a ready opportunity for abuse.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“beyond the mere facts of job duties and pay provisions.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.