Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

204 F. Supp. 2d 4

Georgia v. Ashcroft

District of Columbia District Court · decided 2002-06-03

Cited by 5 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently February 2004

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2002-06-03

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

OBERDORFER, Senior District Judge,

¶1concurring.

¶2I concur in the court’s opinion for substantially the reasons there stated, together with those advanced in my dissent from the court’s April 5, 2002 opinion related to the state Senate.

¶3JUDGMENT

¶4Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58 and for the reasons stated by the court in its Memorandum Opinion and Order docketed this same day, it is hereby

¶5ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the Clerk shall enter final judgment in favor of plaintiff with respect to Georgia’s State Senate reapportionment plan, Act No. 444.

¶6IT IS SO ORDERED FOR THE THREE-JUDGE COURT.

/204/fsupp2d/4 · .json · Public domain