Rashad v. Walsh’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
2 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · Williams v. Taylor · Barker v. Wingo · United States v. Agurs · Kyles v. Whitley
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“in order to get the process working under the [Interstate Agreement on Detainers] to bring [the petitioner] back to Massachusetts”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Rashad v. Walsh“asserted his speedy trial right clearly and unequivocally in his letter.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Rashad v. Walsh“[e]xcept for the [petitioner's] notice to the court in September 1986,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Rashad v. Walsh
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.