Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 204 Ga. App. 156 - State v. Luster

204 Ga. App. 156 - State v. Luster’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

25
cited by 25 later decisions
9
states following
May 2016
most recently cited

25 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently May 2016 · most notably Reinesto v. Superior Court (1995), State v. Martinez (2006)

25 state decisions

100199220002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Harriss · Knight v. State · In Re Irvin · 173 Ga. App. 594 - Curlee v. Mock Enterprises, Inc. · Earth Management, Inc. v. Heard County

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[Statutes should be read according to the natural and most obvious import of the language, without resorting to subtle and forced constructions, for the purpose of either limiting or extending their operation, [cit.], and this principle is particularly compelling when interpreting criminal statutes. [Cit.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “the word `person' in a criminal statute may not be construed to include a fetus unless the legislature has expressly included it, since at common law a fetus was not considered a person.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “criminal statutes must be strictly construed against the state and liberally in favor of human liberty.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.