Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

204 Ill. App. 178

Wolf v. Selig Polyscope Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided February 19, 1917

Appellate Court of Illinois · decided 1917-02-19

<p>Abstract of the Decision.</p> <p>1. Sales, § 1*—when evidence insufficient to show contract. Evidence held to show that no contracts of sale were entered into between the plaintiffs and the defendants respectively which defendants conspired to break, in an action to recover damages, charging that the defendants had so conspired.</p> <p>2. Saxes, § 16*—what are requisites of contract as to definiteness. A contract of sale, to be enforceable, must be definite as to amount, the price, terms of payment, and time of delivery.</p>

Reversed with finding of facts · Decided 1917-02-19

Mr. Presiding Justice McSurely

¶1delivered the opinion of the court.

2. Saxes, § 16*—what are requisites of contract as to definiteness. A contract of sale, to be enforceable, must be definite as to amount, the price, terms of payment, and time of delivery.
/204/illapp/178 · .json · Public domain