Baker v. Morrison

<p>Abstract of the Decision.</p> <p>1. Physicians and stjegeons, § 29*—when evidence sufficient to sustain claim, of recoupment. In an action by a veterinarian for services, evidence held sufficient to sustain defendant’s claim of recoupment, tending to show loss of a number of defendant’s horses from lack of attention by plaintiff.</p> <p>2. Appeal and error, § 1327*—when propriety of judgment is presumed. Where the abstract failed to show whether a defendant’s claim was in set-off or recoupment, held that the propriety of the judgment for plaintiff for one dollar would be presumed.</p> <p>3. Appeal and error, § 1575*—when judgment not reversibly erroneous. A judgment for so small an amount as one dollar held not reversible for a technical error.</p>