Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 204 Ind. 269 - Dunn v. Deitschel

Dunn v. Deitschel’s Empirical Analysis

1930

Citation profile

24
cited by 24 later decisions
1
states following
May 1985
most recently cited

24 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently May 1985

24 state decisions

140193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Lowe v. Reed · Zimmer v. Kilborn · Sain v. Bogle · Epp v. Hinton · Evors v. Bryan

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Under this statute a plaintiff who recovers a judgment is entitled (upon submitting proof in respect thereof ) to recover reasonable attorney's fees....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.