Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 204 Ind. 93 - Harvey v. Lowry

Harvey v. Lowry’s Empirical Analysis

1932

Citation profile

23
cited by 23 later decisions
6
states following
April 2025
most recently cited

20 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently April 2025

20 state decisions

601932194019501960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Ransdel v. Moore · Birke v. Abbott · Irwin's Bank v. Fletcher, Etc., Trust Co., Rec. · Hervey v. Krost · Miller v. Billingsly

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “a 'third party' does not gain the right to sue under a contract merely because he may derive an incidental benefit from the performance of the promisor.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.