Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 204 Kan. 509 - Atkins v. Bayer

Atkins v. Bayer’s Empirical Analysis

1970

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
June 1984
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 12 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Fisher v. O'Brien · Osborn v. Lesser · Johnston, Administratrix v. Ecord · Hill v. Hill

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““However, the fact that it was not does not require reversal. One seeking reversal of a judgment because of exclusion of evidence has the burden of demonstrating prejudice as well as error in the ruling complained of. We think any error in the exclusion was rendered harmless because of other testimony given by the expert witness.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““[Tjhere still exists assurances against admission of opinions which would merely tell the jury what result to reach, somewhat in the manner of the oath-helpers of an earlier day. In sum, an expert’s opinion in a proper case is admissible up to the point where an expression of opinion would require the expert to pass upon the weight or credibility of the evidence.” p. 1231.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.