Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 204 KY 168 - Ketcham v. Commonwealth

Ketcham v. Commonwealth’s Empirical Analysis

1924

Citation profile

28
cited by 28 later decisions
5
states following
January 2001
most recently cited

5 federal appellate · 2 district · 21 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently January 2001 · most notably Pogue v. Swink (1955), Manning v. Ketcham (1932)

5 federal appellate · 2 district · 21 state decisions

80192419301940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Adams v. Gardner · City of Newport v. Newport Light Co. · Bradford v. White · Turner v. Commonwealth

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Thus it may be seen that to be guilty of contempt of court for failure to testify or to answer a question propounded one must fail to answer a proper question propounded in the course of a civil or criminal action or special proceeding.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.