State v. Iseringhausen’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

24 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. ““1. Is the indictment or information sufficient to inform the court what offense is being charged in order that the court might properly regulate the evidence sought to be introduced? “2. Does the indictment or information inform the accused of the nature and cause of the offense with which he is being charged ? “3. Is the indictment sufficient on its face to support a plea of former jeopardy in event there is an attempt to try the defendant more than once for the same offense ?””

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Kelley · State v. Wright

2. ““ * * * Further R.S. 15:203 provides that it shall not be sufficient cause to set aside the venire because of any defect or any irregularity in the manner of selecting the jury, or in the proceedings of the jury commission, unless some fraud has been practiced or some great wrong committed that would work irreparable injury. There has been no showing in this case that any fraud was practiced or great wrong committed, in connection with the drawing and selecting of the jury that would work irreparable injury to these defendants.””

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Knight