Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 204 La. 608 - State v. Burris

State v. Burris’s Empirical Analysis

1943

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
December 1964
most recently cited

10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently December 1964

10 state decisions

40194319501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Richey · State v. Davis

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Whether or not a statement made by a defendant is a confession or admission or an exculpatory statement depends entirely on the -nature of the statement. In order that the jury might clearly understand the nature of the statement made by the defendant, it is not only proper for the trial judge to instruct the jury on the law governing admissions, confessions and exculpatory statements, hut it would appear to us that it would be the better practice to do so in order that the jury might ascertain its nature and the effect to be given it.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.