Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 204 MICH 271 - Marussa v. Temerowski

Marussa v. Temerowski’s Empirical Analysis

1918

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
December 1934
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Lake Erie Land Co. v. Chilinski · Nelson v. Breitenwischer

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““We do not understand it to be claimed that such a decree was not proper under the findings of the court. Nor is it pointed out, and we do not discover, that it is incorrect in amount. The court, having acquired jurisdiction of the case and the parties, should dispose of the controversy. The decree was a most equitable one. Unless there are insuperable legal objections it should be affirmed.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““Whether the money to make the tender was furnished by plaintiffs themselves, or was advanced by one who expected to purchase of them after they had acquired title, is unimportant.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.