Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 204 MISC 719 - Kaye v. Doe

Kaye v. Doe’s Empirical Analysis

1953

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
January 1995
most recently cited

6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently January 1995

6 state decisions

7019531960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Travelers Health Ass'n v. Commonwealth of Virginia State Corporation Commission · Merchants' Mut Automobile Liability Ins Co v. Smart · Jackson v. Citizens Casualty Co. · Bakker v. Aetna Life Ins. Co. · 95 F. Supp. 784 - Ace Grain Co. v. American Eagle Fire Ins. Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““2(a) Any of the following acts in this state, effected by mail or otherwise, by an unauthorized foreign or alien insurer: (1) the issuance or delivery of contracts of insurance to residents of this state or to corporations authorized to do business therein, (2) the solicitations of applications for such contracts, (3) the collection of premiums, membership fees, assessments or other considerations for such contracts, or (4) any other transaction of business, is equivalent to and shall constitute an appointment by such an insurer of the superintendent and his successor in office, to be its true and lawful attorney, upon whom may be served all lawful process in any action, suit or proceeding instituted by or on behalf of an insured or beneficiary arising out of any such contract of insurance, and any such act shall be signification of its agreement that such service of process is of the same legal force and validity as personal service of process in this state upon such insurer.” 27 McKinney’s Consolidated Laws of New York, § 59-a.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.