Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

204 N.C. 162

167 S.E 626

State v. . Byrd

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 8, 1933

Supreme Court of North Carolina · decided 1933-02-08

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently July 2002

3 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1933-02-08

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

AdaMS, J.

¶1 The defendant drew two checks on the Bank of Spruce Pine payable to the order of the Climax Manufacturing Company. Both checks were post-dated — that is, the date on each check was later than the real date of its issue: The question is whether the defendant is guilty of giving a worthless check in violation of section 4283(a) of the Consolidated Statutes.

¶2 The trial court instructed the jury to convict the defendant if they believed the evidence and found beyond a reasonable doubt that he had given the checks, and that it made no difference whether the checks were or were not post-dated.

¶3 They were given for a past account and if post-dated did not import criminal liability. S. v. Crawford, 198 N. C., 522. For error in the instruction the defendant is entitled to a new trial.

¶4 New trial.

/204/nc/162 · .json · Public domain