204 N.C. App. 350 - State v. Bivens’s Empirical Analysis
2010
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
February 2013
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Powell · State v. Morgan · State v. McNeill · State v. Blizzard · State v. Blizzard
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Any substance which is by any means intentionally represented as a controlled substance. It is evidence that the substance has been intentionally misrepresented as a controlled substance if the following factors are established: 1. The substance was packaged or delivered in a manner normally used for the illegal delivery of controlled substances. 2. Money or other valuable property has been exchanged or requested for the substance, and the amount of that consideration was substantially in excess of the reasonable value of the substance. 3. The physical appearance of the tablets, capsules or other finished product containing the substance is substantially identical to a specified controlled substance.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.