Johnson v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

18 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “it must state in clear and unmistakable language: (1) that the parties understand their entitlement to a judicial adjudication of their dispute and are willing to waive that right; (2) that the parties are aware of the limited circumstances under which a challenge to the arbitration award may be advanced and agree to those limitations; (3) that the parties have had sufficient time to consider the implications of their decision to arbitrate; and (4) that the parties have entered into the arbitration agreement freely and voluntarily, after due consideration of the consequences of doing so. [ Id. at 482, 973 A. 2d 347 (footnote omitted).]”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. N.H. v. H.H. · 418 N.J. Super. 262 - Nh v. Hh

2. “[w]hat Fawzy requires is the existence of an arbitration record against which the claim can be tested. That is so whether the arbitration is conducted under the Arbitration Act, APDRA, or under specific procedures agreed upon by the parties.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. 418 N.J. Super. 262 - Nh v. Hh

3. “err on the side of caution and recuse themselves unless there is a true basis that requires disqualification.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
   e.g. 460 N.J. Super. 22 - Goldfarb v. Solimine