204 N.J. Super. 544 - Fulton v. Fulton’s Empirical Analysis
1985
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 12 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently February 2008
3 federal appellate · 12 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Williams v. Williams · Brandenburg v. Brandenburg · 146 N.J. Super. 491 - Jacobson v. Jacobson · 124 N.J. Super. 373 - Olen v. Olen · 200 N.J. Super. 56 - Landwehr v. Landwehr
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““[ajdjudication of a final judgment of divorce at this time would not unjustly deprive the wife of marital assets, but to the contrary would eliminate the potential of injustice to the children insofar as the wife may receive a large portion, if not all, of the assets of the decedent based on intestacy.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Johnson v. Johnson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.