Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 204 Okla. 51 - Kizziar v. Pierce

Kizziar v. Pierce’s Empirical Analysis

1950

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
April 1976
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently April 1976

1 federal appellate · 7 state decisions

40195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Kansas, O. & G. Ry. Co. v. Dillon · Matthews v. Mounts · First State Bank of Canute v. Thomas · J. R. Watkins Co. v. Palmer · City of Ada v. Canoy

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““(6) In 1 Am.Jur. Abandonment, § 8, it is pointed out that the elements of abandonment are: (1) an intention to abandon; and (2) an external act whereby such intention is carried into effect. The intention to abandon is the paramount inquiry. “And in § 9, it is stated further: ‘ * * * Abandonment consists of two elements — act and intention. The act of relinquishment of possession or enjoyment must be accompanied by an intent to part permanently with the right to the thing; otherwise there is no abandonment. * * * ’ ””
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““ * * * The first special charge requested was that the court instruct the jury to return a verdict for defendant. Such special request was of the same effect as a motion for directed verdict, and presented the same question for the trial court’s consideration as a demurrer to the evidence. J. R. Watkins Co. v. Palmer, 193 Old. 684, 146 P.2d 843 . * * * »”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.