Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 204 Okla. 607 - DeBose v. Barker

DeBose v. Barker’s Empirical Analysis

1951

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
February 1953
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Miller & Glass v. Tulsa Tribune Co. · Rorem v. Bodine · Miller v. A. & B. Furn. Co. · Mercer & Co. v. Port · Keas v. Keas

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““In Miller & Glass v. Tulsa Tribune Co., 174 Okla. 80 , 49 P. 2d 726 , it is stated: “ ‘Where a judgment on the pleadings is rendered, the party aggrieved thereby, desiring to appeal, must appeal from that judgment and give notice in open court either at the time or within ten days thereafter of his intention to appeal to the Supreme Court, as provided by section 531, O. S. 1931 (12 O. S. 1941 §954), and where he fails to give such notice within such time, this court is without jurisdiction to review the judgment of the trial court.’ “To the same effect see Baxter v. Nix, 176 Okla. 589 , 56 P. 2d 818 ; Rorem v. Bodine, 178 Okla. 235 , 62 P. 2d 630 ; and Miller v. A. & B. Furniture Co., 173 Okla. 319 , 48 P. 2d 1032 .””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.