204 Or. App. 438 - State v. Howard’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
May 2019
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"Once that garbage was in the collection company's physical possession and control, defendants' privacy interests in the contents of their garbage can were extinguished, as Purvis instructs. A fortiori , the ensuing police examination of the garbage and confiscation of evidence of defendants' drug activities did not invade a privacy interest protected by Article I, section 9."”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Lien“[f]rom a possessory standpoint, the garbage belongs to the sanitation company.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Lien
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.