Blocker v. Hundertmark’s Empirical Analysis
1944
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
November 2005
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The statute of frauds merely requires some memorandum or note of the agreement relating to real estate to be in writing and signed by the party charged therewith or his agent, and does not require a formally executed contract. There must be written evidence of the contract, if there is no written contract, and our court has gone so far as to hold that a letter which recites the contract, but repudiates it, is sufficient. Colleton Realty Co. v. Folk , 85 S.C. 84 , 67 S.E. 156 . As stated in 37 C.J.S., Frauds, Statute of, § 174; `The note or memorandum is not the contract, but only the written evidence of it required by statute.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Cash v. Maddox
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.