McCausland v. Davis’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

1 federal appellate · 9 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “"There are three types of notice by which a party may be held to have had knowledge of a particular fact: actual notice, implied notice (or implied actual notice), and constructive notice. `Actual notice' stems from actual knowledge of the fact in question. `Implied notice' is factual inference of such knowledge, inferred from the availability of a means of acquiring such knowledge when the party charged therewith had the duty of inquiry. `Constructive notice' is the inference of such knowledge by operation of law, as under a recording statute..." In accord, Sapp v. Warner, 105 Fla. 245 , 141 So. 124 (1932).”

   3 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. Regions Bank v. Deluca · Sackheim v. Marine Bank & Trust Co.

2. “"The court below, acting as the factfinder, would have been entitled to find that a prudent man in appellant's position, upon learning of the existence of that note, would have made further inquiry into the exact state of the title to the airplane and that such inquiry, if duly prosecuted, would have revealed Coastal's interest... ." 204 So.2d 336 .”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. Sackheim v. Marine Bank & Trust Co.

3. “"... However, a record, in addition to being constructive notice of its own existence and contents, gives rise to implied notice of such other facts as would be disclosed by duly prosecuted inquiries suggested by it... ." 204 So.2d 336 .”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. Sackheim v. Marine Bank & Trust Co.