204 So. 3d 1019 - State v. Thompson’s Empirical Analysis
2016
Citation profile
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 617 So. 2d 880 - Stobart v. State Through DOTD · 475 So. 2d 756 - Quealy v. Paine, Webber, Jackson & Curtis, Inc. · 968 So. 2d 789 - Hornot v. Cardenas · 855 So. 2d 359 - Saacks v. Mohawk Carpet Corp. · 10 So. 3d 264 - Insurance Co. of North America v. Louisiana Power & Light Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“When prescription is raised by peremptory exception, with evidence being introduced at the hearing on the exception, the trial court's findings of fact on the issue of prescription are subject to the manifest error-clearly wrong standard of review.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.