Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 204 SO3D 965 - Randall v. Griffin

Randall v. Griffin’s Empirical Analysis

2016

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
April 2019
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 471 So. 2d 1274 - Bowen v. Bowen · Bell v. State · 630 So. 2d 1080 - Mordenti v. State · 717 So. 2d 1077 - Migliore v. Migliore · 710 So. 2d 51 - O'Brien v. Florida Birth-Related Neuro.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It is the long standing rule of this Court that when assignments of error are not argued in the briefs they will be deemed abandoned unless jurisdictional or fundamental error appears in the record.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Appellate courts may not address an issue not raised in the briefs unless the issue amounts to fundamental error.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.