Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

204 S.W. 335

Ramos v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · decided 1918-05-29

<p>Appeal from Nacogdoches County Court; J. F. Perritte, Judge.</p> <p>Didie Ramos was convicted of violating the local option law, and he appeals.</p>

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently January 1968

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Affirmed · Decided 1918-05-29

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

DAVIDSON, P. J.

¶1Appellant was convicted o'f violating the local option law; his punishment being assessed at a fine of $62.50 and 20 days’ imprisonment in the county jail.

¶2There are no legal questions presented for revision. It is contended, however, that the evidence is not sufficient. The state’s testimony shows a sale by the defendant to the alleged purchaser ' Collins. Collins testified that he bought a quart and a half or a quart and a pint of whisky from appellant and paid him $2.75 for it. Appellant denies the transaction. This formed an issue of fact for solution by the jury. Under this condition of the record we would not feel justified in reversing the case.

¶3The judgment therefore will be affirmed.

/204/sw/335 · .json · Public domain