Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

204 S.W.3d 237

State v. Adams

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided August 29, 2006

Missouri Court of Appeals · decided 2006-08-29

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently November 2008

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2006-08-29

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1ORDER

PER CURIAM.

¶2Terry R. Adams (hereinafter, “Defendant”) appeals from the judgment entered after a jury found him guilty of one count of forgery, Section 570.090 RSMo (2000). The trial court sentenced Defendant, as a prior and persistent offender, to a term of fifteen years’ imprisonment. He claims the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress and introducing evidence of certain items at trial because those items were seized improperly.

¶3We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision.

¶4The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

/204/sw3d/237 · .json · Public domain