Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 204 TENN 164 - Conner v. Holbert

Conner v. Holbert’s Empirical Analysis

1958

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
February 1970
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Moreover, mere delay or laches alone is never sufficient to cause a court of equity to penalize an account of same unless some deleterious result flows from the delay/’ Conner v. Holbert, 204 Tenn. 164 , 319 S.W.2d 72 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.