Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 204 U.S. 522 - Eau Claire National Bank v. Jackman

Eau Claire National Bank v. Jackman’s Empirical Analysis

204 U.S. 522 · 1907

Citation profile

41
cited by 41 later decisions
8
cited 8 times by the Supreme Court
7
states following
September 1967
most recently cited

10 federal appellate · 3 district · 11 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 41 later decisions (8 by the Supreme Court) — most recently September 1967 · most notably St Louis Iron Mountain Southern Railway Company v. May Taylor W (1908), Brown v. Gerdes (1944)

10 federal appellate · 3 district · 11 state decisions

1801907191019201930194019501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on York Manufacturing Company v. Arthur Cassell J B · Pirie v. Chicago Title & Trust Co. · Frank Thompson v. Henry Fairbanks · Crawford v. Burke · Keppel v. Tiffin Savings Bank

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 41 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““A demand is not necessary where it is to be presumed that it would have been unavailing. Davenport v. Dadd, 38 Minn. 545 , 38 N. W. 622 ; Bogle v. Gordon, 39 Kan. 31 , 17 Pac. 857 .””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.