Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 204 VA 218 - Commonwealth v. McNeely

Commonwealth v. McNeely’s Empirical Analysis

1963

Citation profile

46
cited by 46 later decisions
2
states following
May 2011
most recently cited

46 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 46 later decisions — most recently May 2011 · most notably Lane v. Scott (1979), Doe v. Thomas (1984)

46 state decisions

140196319701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Burke v. Scott · Simpson v. Commonwealth · Bolling v. Hawthorne Coal & Coke Co. · Daniels v. Transfer Co. · Butler v. Darden

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 46 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[This power] can only be exercised where the verdict is plainly wrong or without credible evidence to support it. If there is a conflict in the testimony on a material point, or if reasonable [persons] may differ in their conclusions of fact to be drawn from the evidence, or if the conclusion is dependent on the weight to be given the testimony, the trial judge cannot substitute his conclusion for that of the jury merely because he would have voted for a different verdict if he had been on the jury.”
    8 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““* # # To be incredible, evidence must be either so manifestly false that reasonable men ought not to believe it, or it must be shown to be false by objects or things as to the existence and meaning of which reasonable men should not differ.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.