Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 204 Wis. 2d 177 - State v. Ingram

204 Wis. 2d 177 - State v. Ingram’s Empirical Analysis

1996

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
May 2007
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Love v. United States · 101 Wis. 2d 441 - State v. Baldwin · 196 Wis. 2d 817 - State v. Rogers · 49 Wis. 2d 683 - Nicholas v. State · United States v. Bland

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[w]e cannot imagine too many other instances where informing the jury about the defendant's current probation or parole status, or about the defendant's success under supervision, could be more relevant than prejudicial.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “This evidence . . . suggested that Ingram did not want to be caught driving a car after he had been out for the evening and provided an answer to why he tried to flee the officer that evening.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.