State v. Robertson’s Empirical Analysis
2019
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
July 2019
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Ornelas v. United States · Miller v. Fenton · Schisler v. State · North v. North · Conyers v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[a]buse of discretion exists where no reasonable person would take the view adopted by the trial court, or when the court acts without reference to guiding rules or principles.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Heath“well removed from any center mark ... and beyond the fringe of what [is] minimally acceptable”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Heath“will not be reversed simply because the appellate court would not have made the same ruling.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Heath
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.