¶1The action is to recover damages for the publication of a libel upon the plaintiff .who was a member of the Assembly of the State of New York. In" my opinion the articles published by the defendant are only susceptible of one meaning, that the plaintiff had been bribed to stay away from a meeting of the judiciary committee of the Assembly, of which he was a member, at which he knew a motion would be made to report certain bills which gave the Public Service Commission power to authorize an increase in fare on street, subway and elevated railroads, notwithstanding contractual fare limitations in their franchise grants. The articles stress the large corruption fund in the possession of the traction lobby, and the very valuable service to the lobby rendered by the plaintiff and another Assemblyman by remaining away from the meeting, and negative every other excuse for their absence, thus impressing upon the reader the conclusion that the only possible inference was the corrupt one. The articles are libelous per se, and the defenses are, therefore, insufficient and should be stricken out.
¶2The order should be reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion granted, with ten dollars costs.
¶3Clarke, P. J., Smith, Merrell and McAvoy, JJ., concur.
¶4Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs.